Ive been looking at how our FTSE 100 banks have performed over the past 10 years, and it was quite a shocker to reflect on just how badly Royal Bank of Scotland has fared.
But what about Banco Santander (LSE: BNC) (NYSE: SAN.US)? Its based in Spain, one of the deeply-troubled eurozone economies, yet its always been relatively prudently managed even if it does have what might seem like a bizarre dividend policy compared to most in the sector.
Before I look at dividends, a quick check shows that between the end of September 2004 and the same date a decade later, Banco Santander shares have risen in price by a modest 1.3%, so 10,000 invested back then would be worth 10,130 today. Never mind comparing with a savings account, a return like that barely beats sticking the cash under your mattress!
Dividends
So its all down to dividends, and on that score Banco Santander has rewarded its shareholders reasonably well.
Dividend yields have been exceptionally high, reaching the 5% mark during the middle few years of our decade and soaring to 8-9% and more in recent years! And the bank was doing this even when earnings didnt come close to covering the annual cash payout.
That was possible because Santanders Spanish shareholders typically took scrip dividends instead of cash, and so the bank didnt actually have to find the money to pay them it just issued new shares.
Of course, theres no such thing as free scrip, and the issuing of so many new shares has been one of the reasons the share price itself has done so poorly, with earnings per share spread across more and more shares each year. But what did the dividend achieve?
Well, youd have added a further 6,454 to your investment pot, taking your stash up to 16,584.
Reinvest?
With reinvestment, you actually wouldnt had had much extra, largely thanks to Santanders yield having risen so strikingly only in the last few years so youd have bought more new shares at relatively low prices in recent years and you wouldnt have bought so many when they were a lot more expensive.
Still, such a strategy would only have added 304 to the pot above the reward youd have had taking it as cash, giving you a final value of 16,888 pounds or 68.9% over 10 years, which isnt bad.
I think the lesson is that its always the total return that counts, regardless of how its split between price growth and dividend income.
A well-balanced portfolio chosen from a number of sectors really is the best way to build yourself a healthy retirement pot, and the Motley Fool’s latest analysis of Five Shares To Retire On should give you some welcome help in your search for great candidates.
It covers five very solid blue-chip shares and tells you why our experts think they’ll serve you well in the decades ahead.
The report is free for a limited time only, so click here to get your personal copy today.
Alan Oscroft has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.
