Im always on the lookout for companies that are not acting in the best interests of shareholders.
Indeed, as shareholders are ultimately owners of the businesses they invest in, management teams should, at all times, act in thebest interests ofshareholders.
But in many cases, management ignores this fundamental goal.
And there are signs that Gulf Keystone Petroleum(LSE: GKP) andShells(LSE: RDSB) executives have made this fatal mistake.
Not impressed
When Shell announced that it was planning to buyBG Grouplast month, opposition to the deal started to buildimmediately.
And over the past 30 days it has become increasingly apparent that the market does not support Shells decision to buy its smaller peer. For example, over the past 30 days Shells shares have fallen by 5.7%, underperforming the FTSE 100 by 4.6% and the wider oil & gas producers sector by 1.7%.
Over the same period, BG hasonly underperformed by 1.0%.
Long-termdrag
The market is concerned that Shell is overpaying for BG. Shells offer is essentially an enormous multi-billion dollar bet on the price of oil.
If the oil price recovers, the deal will make sense. However, if the price of oil continues to languish, as many forecasters are predicting, the BG acquisition could prove to be a drag on Shells earnings for years to come.
Whats more, BG is trying to grapple with numerous operations problems. Including concerns withinEgypt andto production problems within Brazil. Also, the company is exposed to thePetrobras scandal, as Petrobras is BGs primary partner in Brazil.
Petrobras issue
As Brazils state oil company, Petrobras takes a stake in almost all of the countrys oil & gas projects. So, BG has to work closely with the group.
Petrobras is the sole operator of five pre-saltoilfieldsin the Santos Basin, offshore Brazil. BG has a stake in each of these five fields, all of whichare highly soughtafter assets.
Unfortunately, this exposes BG to Petrobrass troubles. There are concerns that Petrobras wont be able to fulfil its obligations to BG due to its on-going corruption scandal.
Without Petrobras support, BGs Brazilian assets could become a thorn in the companys side.
Burning cash
The market is concerned that Shell is wasting time and money on its acquisition of BG.
Meanwhile, Gulf Keystone is burning through cash as it tries to keep the lights on.
According to the FinancialTimes, Gulf Keystones CEOJohn Gerstenlauer has reported that the company is burning through cash at a rate of $8m to $10m a month.
In addition, the company is still owed around $330mby the Kurdistan authorities for its share of oil sales.
Gulf Keystone conducted a placing at the end of March to raise just under $41m. Prior to the placing, the companys cash balance amounted to $86m, including the placing cash, at the end of March Gulf Keystone had around $127m in cash available to it.
At present cash burn rates, excluding any additional repayments of oil revenues owed, Gulf Keystone has around 11 months of cash left before it has to tap the market for more funding.
Sensible investments
In many cases, investors underestimate the importance of a strong management team that looks after company cash.
Here at the Motley Fool we love championing CEOs and investors who go against the grain of the City institutions and fund managers.
We’re always on the lookoutfor the market’s best hiddengems and business visionaries.
To that end, our team of top analysts has put together thisFREEreport,”3 Hidden Factors Behind This Daring E-commerce Play“.
This issomethingyou do not want to miss and we’re offering you the chance to find out more for free right now — justclick here.
Rupert Hargreaves owns shares of Royal Dutch Shell B. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.
