During the past 12 months, Marks and Spencers (LSE: MKS)shares have outperformed the wider FTSE 100 by around 28% as the companys turnaround starts to take shape.
However, its unlikely that this rally will last, and investors could use this chance to sell up and buy Next (LSE: NXT), which has a more impressive record of creating value for shareholders.
Lumpy figures
Marks and Spencers gains are a direct result of the companys upbeat trading figures. Indeed, the company beat expectations for the first quarter by reporting that clothing sales and homeware sales at established stores rose by 0.7% in the 13 weeks to 28 March, bringing a halt to four years of declines.
This impressive performance didnt last for long. During the 13 weeks to 27 June,general merchandise sales declined 0.4% on a like-for-like basis. Food sales expanded 0.3% on a like-for-like basis.
Marks and Spencer has been trying, and failing, to re-ignite sales growth of clothing and homeware items for several years to no avail, while smaller, more nimble peers (like Next) have eaten away at the groups market share.
And Marks and Spencers position in the market, as anold-fashioned, bricks-and-mortar retailer with a high-cost base, puts it at a disadvantage when trying to compete with experienced multi-channel retailers like Next.
High returns
The difference in return on capital employed between the two companies really illustrates this point.Simply put,ROCE is a telling and straightforward gauge for comparing the relative profitability of similar businesses and is an excellent way to measure a companys success.
According to my figures, Marks and Spencers five-year average ROCE is a respectable 13.9%, but its been falling steadily. Nexts five-year average ROCE is a staggering 58.2%.
Standing out
These returns mean that Next stands out from its peer group. Additionally, the company is devoted to returning excess cash to investors.
Last year, Next paid out 223m in special dividends to shareholders on top of the regular payout giving a total dividend yield of 4.6%. Figures suggest that the companys total dividend issuance this year will give investors a yield of around 5%. City figures suggest that Marks and Spencer shares will only yield around 3% this year.Next intends to pay a special dividend of 60 pence per share on 2 November 2015.
Furthermore, Next is one of the few companies that has a disciplined stock repurchase programme in place. Specifically, the company will only buy back shares if it can earn an 8% return on the repurchase, for this to happen, the companys share price has to drop below 6,827p.
This disciplined strategy has helped the company increase earnings per share by 1000% over the past 15years. Operating profits have only expanded 350% over the same period.Earnings per share have doubled since 2011.
Still, this kind of growth comes at a cost and Nexts shares arent cheap. The company is currently trading at a forward P/E of 19.3, but Marks and Spencer shares look slightly cheaper on the face of it, as the company is trading at a forward P/E of 15.5. However, the difference in performance of the two companies over the past few years easily explains the valuation gap.
Foolish summary
So overall, when Marks and Spencer and Next are placed side by side, Next comes out on top. Thats why I would sell Marks and Spencer and use the cash tobuy Next.
But if Next’s not your cup of tea, our analysts have recently identified a stockthat has the potential to increase profits by300% to 500%over the next few years.
The company in question is led by a renegade CEO, who has shunned the City but has managed todouble group sales within five years. The company in question has a proven advantage over its peers and is led by a revolutionary management team.
To find out more, simply readthe team’s newFREEreport,”3 Hidden Factors Behind This Daring E-commerce Play“.
This issomethingyou do not want to miss and we’re offering you the chance to find out more for free right now — justclick here.
Rupert Hargreaves has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.
