Shire (LSE: SHP) andAstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) are two very different companies with very different outlooks.Shireis growing rapidly and snapping up smaller peers to complement organic growth, but the companys shares are relatively expensive.
On the other hand, Astras sales have been contracting for several years now. And while the group has one of the best treatment pipelines in the business, it will take several years for the drugs Astra currently has under development to generate income for the company.
So, when trying to decide between the two companies, investors need to ask themselves if theyre willing to pay a premium price for growth now, or pay less and wait for growth to materialise.
Valuation is key
Astra and Shires outlooks are reflected in their current valuations. For example, Shirecurrently trades at a forward P/E 20.6, while Astra is currently trading at a forward P/E of 15.1. Shires earnings per share are forecast to expand by around 17% during the next two years. Astras EPS are set to contract by around 5%.
Moreover, Shire is currently chasing the acquisition of Baxalta, another specialist in rare disease treatments. If Shires management gets Baxalta shareholders to accept the companys offer, it will create aglobal leader in rare disease drugs with projected product sales of $20bn by 2020.
Further, based on current treatment pipelines, the enlarged group could launch more than 30 new products, with an incremental sales potential of $5bn by 2020. Shires management is also planning to undertake ashare buyback to minimise dilution after the all-stock transaction.
Still, it remains to be seen if the deal between Shire and Baxalta will actually go ahead. Baxaltas management has signalled that it intends to turn down Shires low-ball offer.
Buy and hold
Even if Shires attempt to buy Baxalta fails, the companys double-digit organic growth rate is still worth paying a premium for. However, as Astras earnings are contracting, investors are turning their backs on the company.
But Astra shouldnt be written off just yet. The group is one of the cheapest companies in the global big pharma sector, and with more than 200 new products under development, Astra has plenty ofpotential.
Astra is planning to conduct 50 treatment trials this year, with several product launches planned between now and 2017. According to City analysts, three of these treatments have the potential to be blockbusters, which can return the company to growth by 2017, as targeted by management.
Granted, theres no guarantee that Astra will be able to return to growth by 2017, and the companys valuation reflects this. Although, with so many new products under development, theres a good chance that the company will be able to return to growth before the end of the decade.
The bottom line
All in all, if youre prepared to pay a premium for near-term earnings growth, Shire looks like the best bet. However, if you dont want to pay a premiumand are prepared to wait forthegroup to return to growth, Astracould be the better investment.
Paid to wait
It will take time for Astra to return to growth, but the company is one of the FTSE 100s dividend champions, and investors will be paid to wait.
At present, Astra supports an attractive dividend yield of 4.4%, and this payout should be here to stay, as it islinked to management compensation.
Dependable dividends are not easy to find, there are plenty of companies out there that have cut their payouts at a moment’s notice.
With this in mind, if you’re looking for dependable dividend payers then why not check out theMotley Fool’s new free report.
The report is titled“How To Create Dividends For Life”and outlines thefive golden rulesfor building a dividend portfolio.
Click hereto download your free copy today!
Rupert Hargreaves owns shares of AstraZeneca. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.
