Shares inCircle Holdings(LSE: CIRC) have slumped by more than a fifth today, after the company revealed that it was pulling out of the contract toHinchingbrooke Health Care NHS Trust. Management hasdetermined that the contract to manage the hospital is no longer sustainable, citinga cut in funding for the hospital as the main reason whythe franchise is no longer viable.
According to Circle, government funding forHinchingbrooke has been cut by 10% this year. Management believes that, after this funding cut, Circle would have to make a substantial investment in the franchise on top of the 5m it is already required to provide.
Of this 5m investment, Circle has already provided 4.8m. So, under the contract Circle is require to provide an additional 160,000 toHinchingbrooke in addition tocontract termination and re-procurement costs, which are capped at 2m.
According to City analysts, this move by Circle will have no effect onpre-tax profit for 2015 and 2016. the company is currently forecast to report a pre-tax loss of 7m for 2015 and loss of 6.8m for 2016 however, pre-tax profitability for 2017 and 2018 is expected to be affected by 3m and 4m respectively.
And it remains to be seen how this move will affect Circles ability to win additional contracts with the NHS in future. As well asHinchingbrooke, the group has also been awarded a 125m contract to provide musculoskeletal services for 440,000 patients in Bedfordshire for five years and is in the running to manage George Eliot hospital in Nuneaton.
Until the repercussions of this move are clear, Circles future is uncertain.
Drug failure
As Circle slumps,GW Pharmaceuticals(LSE: GWP) is charging higher today, after announcing yesterday thatone of three Phase III cancer pain trials of its Sativex compound failed to meet its primary endpoint. After releasing the news yesterday, GWs shares fell as much as 21% at one point but they quickly recovered and they ended the day unchanged.
Even though one of GWs trails has failed, the company still has two additional trials under way. If these trials yield positive results, GW would be able tosubmit a new drug application with the US Food and Drug Administration.
Furthermore, within yesterdays update, GWsaid that all of its trials in its Epidiolex programme for treatment-resistant childhood epilepsies are on track. Phase III data from at least one of its trials now expected by the end of 2015.
Overall, even though one of GWs trails failed to yield the desired results, the company still has plenty of irons in the fire. That being said, investors should keep in mind that only 7% of all new drugs successfully make it from the research and development stage, through to commercial production. So the odds are stacked against GW.
Nevertheless, only you can decide if GWfits in your portfolio and I thoroughly recommend that you do some additional research before making a trading decision. And if you do decide to buy GW, or Circle, a basket approach will work best.
Basket Approach
Simply put, a basket approach combines a selection of risky growth stocks with a core portfolio of defensive dividend paying companies. Using this method allows you to reduce risk and sleep soundly at night.
To help you build your dividend portfolio, the Motley Fool’s top analysts have put togetherthis freereportrevealing the secrets on how you can“Create Dividends For Life”.
Justclick hereto download the report for free today and start building your dividend portfolio today!
Get FREE Issues of The Motley Fool Collective
Get straightforward advice on whats really happening with the stock markets, direct to your inbox. Help yourself with our FREE email newsletter designed to help you protect and grow your portfolio wealth.
By providing your email address, you consent to receiving further information on our goods and services and those of our business partners. To opt-out of receiving this information click here. All information provided is governed by our Privacy Statement.
Rupert Hargreaves has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.
