When I last wrote about pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) (NYSE: GSK.US) back in August, the shares were at 1382p. Todays 1400p sees the price trading in the same area, but I cant help thinking the trend still appears to point down.
The recent three-quarter results wont help sentiment. On a constant-exchange-rate basis, revenue for the year so far is down 7%, operating profit is down 24% and earnings per share are down 28%. Predictions for a poor years trading are looking correct.
Is the valuation too rich?
GlaxoSmithKlines forward P/E rating hovers just under 15 for 2015. Doesnt sound too bad, does it? Yet, it looks rich compared to predictions of just 3% growth in earnings that year, and that after an estimated 17% earnings decline this year. In fact, earnings have been volatile over the last few years.
So lets look at the dividend to justify the valuation. A 5.8% forward yield is enticing, but with adjusted earnings set to cover the payout just over once, to me it looks vulnerable. Maybe the firms record on cash generation underpins optimism:
|
Year to December |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
|
Net cash from operations (m) |
7,841 |
6,797 |
6,250 |
4,375 |
7,222 |
Here we find encouragement. Naturally, both maintenance and growth capex compete with the dividend for the firms cash flow, but cash flow is the great strength that makes defensives such as GlaxoSmithKline so worthy of investor confidence.
Dividend payments cost GlaxoSmithKline around 3,918 million last year. So, assuming that this years cash flow isnt down there should be ample funds to service the dividend, which is why the directors run dividend cover so close to the wire.
Cash is king
It seems that dividend yield, backed by cash flow, is the dominant factor that justifies GlaxoSmithKlines valuation at present. Investors place their faith in the firms ability to develop and market a new generation of blockbusting drugs that could reignite earnings growth down the line.
Lets hope that confidence in the firms pipeline pays off. It wouldnt surprise me if speculation drove GlaxoSmithKlines share price artificially high in the wake of Pfizers pitch at AstraZeneca. If so, there could be downside risk if the next numbers on cash flow disappoint.
What also of the valuation-cycle effect that tends to push defensive-style companies around? The valuations of defensives can move counter to the wider economic cycle. Companies seen as defensive, with reliable income streams, are most appealing to investors in volatile economic times, and valuations can rise. In more benign economic times investors often head for exciting investments and the defensives can see their valuations contract.
What next?
Well find out more with the full-year results due around 5 February Ill be heading straight for the cash flow report.
GlaxoSmithKline doesn’t seem like an obvious ‘must buy’ right now. There are, however, many great opportunities available on the London market, and I’m pleased to have a new exclusive wealth report from the Motley Fool to help me find them.
The paper signposts some top-notch investment opportunities available right now, ripe for your own analysis.
“How You Could Retire Seriously Rich” is 100% free and without obligation, although availability is limited.
There is a chance to get a copy today by clicking here.
Kevin Godbold has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended GlaxoSmithKline. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.
