Sirius Minerals(LSE: SXX) is up 50% in the last month alone should you buy or sell it right now?
And, equally important, should you bet on a takeover of this potash developer?
Consider This
Firstly, you ought to be very careful before considering Sirius to be either a value or a growth play. In fact, at present we have no elements to suggest that Sirius is worth much. Its all about expectations based on itsYork Potash project study.
Secondly, as speculation about a change of ownership persists, youll likely burn your fingersif thats the only reason whyyou are buying into the stock.In fact, the fall could be painful, and the more the stock appreciates, the less likely a takeover will become.
On The Up
The market cap of this potash development company has risen to 225 fromabout 150m since 11 March, when Sirius announced it would raise new equity aside from that, nothing relevant has happened since, aside from certainpotato trial results.
By carrying out these trials in these important markets like the United States and UK, where potatoes are a key crop, we continue to validate the effectiveness and value of polyhalite, chief executiveChris Fraser said on 2 April.
You may well argue that such an update is not worth 75m of incremental value!
Well, its sales are zero and its operating cash flow profile hasnt improved, as Sirius is still burning between 1.5m and 3m a month, according to my calculations. On that basis, its recentcash call of 15m is small change, really, particularly taking into account that its potash mine project is still pendingplanning permission.
How Much Are You Paying For Sirius?
One caveat is that is virtually impossible to make any reliable assumptions at this stage of maturity for the business, but lets say that Sirius will start generating revenue at some point in future.This could be a highly lucrative business with hefty margins, and I can see why some investors are willing to take risks.
Based on the valuation of similar businesses I have studied over the years, the current market value of Sirius impliesthat investors believe the company will be able to generate 40m of forward revenues, which should produce net income of 10m current net losses stand at about 8m on a yearly basis and adjusted operating cash flow of 14m. Such high margins 25% and 35%, respectively are not out whack with reality, and they could determine a valuation premium of between 40% and 60% versus more mature potash players.
Many other factors such as the value of its assets, growth and capital invested should be considered, of course, but what this scenario implies is that, assuming thecurrent market cap of Sirius remains constant over time, its shares would trade on forward earnings and core cash flow multiples of 16x and 22x, respectively. Under this scenario,gross cash and gross debt on the balance sheet equal zero.Its implied revenue multiple would be 5.6x.
In truth, investors are snapping up the shares of a business that wont generate any revenues and income for a very long time, and whose fair value, based on its assets base, is merely speculative right now.These numbers are essentially for illustrative purposes only, given that theres no hard evidence upon which to base a proper judgment.In fact, Sirius is a business that will need billions of investment to generate several hundred millions of earnings, at least theoretically.
To put my numbers into context, consider that, according to Sirius, the project study was completed to a level of accuracy of +/- 25% and that, as part of thestudy, the expansion of NPK (which is part 2 of the study) could deliver incremental annual Ebitda in the range of $374 $617m from approximately 2.5mtpa of polyhalite.
To me, thats stuff for a behemoth in the chemicals space
Frankly, for a lower level of risk and steady double-digit medium-term returns, you should consider at least a couple of value and growth stocksmentioned inour FREE investmentreport, which also includes companies offering an appealing yield!
Our research includes many value opportunities thatwill comfortably outperform Sirius and similar risky equity bets—most of them are still dirt cheap based on their growth prospects!
I am convinced that — in line with the Fool’s track record — our top picks will likely deliver a 20% annual return, and to achieve that, you just have to consider some smart ideas contained inour FREE report, which isavailableonly for a limited amount of time.
Alessandro Pasetti has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.