Ive been looking at the total returns from some of out most popular FTSE 100 stocks over the past decade, and the banks have been some of the most traumatic.
Bailed-out Lloyds Banking Group, for example, would have reduced a 10,000 investment to just 3,500 in the 10 years between September 2004 and September 2014, but that was a resounding success compared to the bank that Fred shredded.
Before a fall
Prior to the crash, when Mr Goodwin and his cronies were splashing the cash on acquisitions as if it was going out of fashion, RBS actually had a two-for-one stock split, its shares were getting so headily priced. But those acquisitions proved disastrous, and crank forward a few years and the price had crashed so low it was time for a 10-for-one consolidation.
Accounting for both of those, RBS shares have dropped from an effective price of 68.45 apiece at the end of September 2004, to just 368p a decade later! Thats a cringe-making fall of 95%, and 10,000 invested in shares back then would be worth just 538 today!
Now, this is the point at which I like to point out that share-price appreciation alone is not the whole story, and I reveal what a handsome addition youd have had from 10 years of dividends!
Er, what dividends?
Well, I know, youre ahead of me. RBSs dividend before the crash was low, and it was stopped altogether as part of the bail-out deal. In total, youd have had only an extra 211 in cash to add to your pot.
But as it happens, RBSs share price performance was so abysmal, that would have actually bumped your pot from that 538 as far as 749. Whoa, party time!
Actually, youd have done better to spend your dividend cash on a very modest party than do what is usually more sensible, which is to reinvest in more RBS shares each year. I know were talking about only 211, but buying more shares before the crash would have lost you most of that.
Youd have lost that too
In fact, youd have dropped 185 of your dividend returns, and youd be left with an investment worth just 564.
If you did invest in RBS all that time ago, I do hope it was only a small portion of a well-balanced portfolio.
A well-balanced portfolio chosen from a number of sectors really is the best way to build yourself a healthy retirement pot, and the Motley Fool’s latest analysis of Five Shares To Retire On should give you some welcome help in your search for great candidates.
It covers five very solid blue-chip shares and tells you why our experts think they’ll serve you well in the decades ahead (but I’ll let you in on a secret — RBS isn’t one of them!)
The report is free for a limited time only, so click here to get your personal copy today.
Alan Oscroft has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.