One-time FTSE 100 hopeful Quindell (LSE: QPP) recently fessed up to runningaggressive and not appropriate accounting policies in parts of its business (RNS, 30/3/15). Shareholders are set to vote this Friday on whether to accept a save-the-day cash offer for most of their company from Aussie firm Slater & Gordon. They look sure to vote in favour of the deal.
This article is about the businesses Quindell will have left.
The Board has told us that the retained businesses generated profit before tax (excluding exceptional items) of 6.8m in 2013, and 8.5m in H1 2014 (RNS, 1/4/15).
Some of the retained businesses are non-core for the Boards vision of new Quindell, and management will seek to dispose of them. Is there any value in them?
Well, Quindells collection of gas, electric and telecoms broking businesses which include Business Advisory Service Limited, UK Sun Limited, Utility Switch Limited and Utility Supplier Services Limited did EBITDA of 1.8m in 2013 with 3m anticipated for 2014.
Similarly, Quindell Property Services which includes Brand Extension (UK) Limited, BE Insulated (UK) Limited, QPS Energy Limited, QPS Scaffolding Limited, QPS South West Limited, Sunlite Solutions and the assets of Loft Space Insulation Limited did EBITDA of 1.4m in H1 2014.
On the face of it, then, in addition to the cash coming in from Slater & Gordon, there could be some modest cash inflows from non-core disposals if the kind of earnings numbers quoted above are clean.
Ultimately, the remaining core of new Quindell will comprise a range of technology businesses with strong growth potential, in particular: connected car and telematics (Himex, iter8) ; insurance claims management systems (Quindell Enterprise Technology Solutions) ; and insurance brokerage utilising technology and telematics (Ingenie)(RNS, 30/3/15).
The table below shows some financials for these core businesses; specifically, acquisition costs and profit before tax (PBT) for 2013.
|Business||Acquisition costs (m)||2013 PBT (m)|
|Quindell Enterprise Technology Solutions (4)||9.5||26.4|
(1) Acquisition cost (Annual Report 2013, p. 84, 85, 90; and RNS, 14/7/2014). PBT: Himex posted abbreviated accounts (no P&L statement) claiming small company exemption; previously posted full accounts for 2012, recording a profit before tax of 512 (Companies House).
(2) Acquisition cost (RNS, 21/7/11; RNS, 12/4/12; Annual Report 2013, p. 84, 85, 90; and RNS, 14/7/2014). PBT: Ingenie posted abbreviated accounts (no P&L statement) claiming small company exemption; previously posted full accounts for 2012, recording a loss before tax of 1.3m (Companies House).
(3) Acquisition cost: agreed valuation (RNS, 18/4/13). PBT: for 8.5 months post acquisition (Quindell Annual Report 2013, p. 80).
(4) Acquisition cost: IT-Freedom, now Quindell Enterprise Technology Solutions has been acquired by the Group at a valuation of 9,465,640.28p (RNS, 24/5/12). PBT: for full year (www.duedil.com/company/04500346/quindell-enterprise-technology-solutions-limited/financials).
Theres something of an oddity in the table in the shape of the 26.4m 2013 PBT of Quindell Enterprise Technology Solutions (QETS). As mentioned earlier, weve been told that the PBT for the entire retained businesses for 2013 was 6.8m (excluding exceptional items). Is the QETS PBT an error, or does it include some very large exceptional item(s)? If the QETS PBT is correct and doesnt include some very large exceptional item(s), it would suggest that there were some hefty losses elsewhere within the retained businesses. The non-core operations Ive looked at dont appear to have been major loss-makers, which leaves Quindells biggest acquisitions, Himex (bought for 165.3m) and Ingenie (bought for 55.2m), as the potential culprits.
For 2014, we have no profit numbers at all for the component parts of the new core business. All we know, as mentioned earlier, is that PBT for the entire retained businesses for H1 was 8.5m. This would be consistent with profit growth at iter8 and QETS (and some non-core businesses), and a continuation of the mooted hefty losses at Himex and/or Ingenie butis merely supposition.
Foolish bottom line
As things stand, then, we are really in the darkabout the profit-generating capacity of the new core Quindell the success of which the Board says will require some prudent capital investment supplemented by the cash flow such businesses produce themselves (RNS, 30/3/15).
As such, I am not surprised that at this stage the market is valuing Quindell at only a modest premium to the cash (up to 500m, initially) that the Board intends to distribute to shareholdersfromthe Slater & Gordon deal.
I would suggest that investors need a lot more in the way of hard numbers on new Quindell particularly Himex and Ingenie to be able to make a considered valuation of the business that will be left after Slater & Gordon and non-core asset disposals have all played out.
In the meantime, you may be interested in a big growth opportunity, with no baggage, that’s about to break from under the radar. This established business — a leader in its sector — is on the brink of a bold global e-commerce expansion that could TREBLE profits within 5 years.
This company’s potential has been spotted by the Motley Fool’s market-beating experts, but has not yet been recognised by most investors. More details of this emerging opportunity are available in a brand-new FREE report, “3 Hidden Factors Behind This Daring E-commerce Play“.
To find out more with no obligation, click here now.
The Hidden True Story Behind This Black Sheep Stock!
This controversial British retail tycoon is unloved by the city and even his own shareholders.
But behind the media headlines, his company is about to make a daring global e-commerce play that could take many people by surprise
and may make savvy investors who get on-board now very rich in the years ahead.
Read on to discover THREE hidden factors that we believe make this one of your most potentially lucrative investments of 2015!
G A Chester has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.