Throughout the history of trade, there have been bubbles and manias. Perhaps the most famous was the tulip mania that gripped Europe in 1637, when a single tulip bulb sold for around ten times the annual salary of a skilled craftsman. Of course, this level of insanity couldnt continue and the price of tulip bulbs duly crashed, leaving those investors who failed to get out in time in a very unfortunate position.
In fact, experiencing losses at the hands of a bubble or mania is a lot more common than many investors realise. Even in the last fifteen years there have been a handful of major bubbles. Some of themhave burst, but others are yet to do so.
For example, the dot.com bubble of the late 1990s and early 2000s was perhaps less crazy than tulip mania, but left equally dire consequences for holders of tech stocks. On the one hand, the internet has had a major impact on the way business is done, how consumers consume, and the nature ofpeoples interaction with each other.
However, on the other hand, the idea that companies thathad minimal assets, no revenue and little more than an bright idea (and not always that) could be worth millions was obviously quite ridiculous. Inevitably, the bubble burst and the prices of such companies collapsed to zero in many cases leaving their investors (perhaps better called speculators) with little or nothing.
Fuelling the fire
Of course, it could be argued that getting out of such bubbles before they burst is a sound way to make money. George Soros the hedge fund investor famous for making 1bn by betting against the Bank of England apparently subscribes to this view, saying that when he sees a bubble forming he rushes to buy, adding fuel to the fire. Clearly, such a move is risky, but can yield spectacularreturns, so long as the position is sold before the bubble bursts.
The challenge, though, is identifying the right moment to sell. Realistically, this is impossible to do accurately and consistently. For example, long before the dot.com bubble burst there were signs that the valuations of tech stocks had gone above and beyond any reasonable level. However, they kept going up, and so investors were faced with the choice ofeither not taking part in the huge price rises thatwere making so many peoplepaper millionaires, or else risking being caught swimming naked when the tide turned.
Never ending story?
Perhaps the most talked about bubble at the moment is the UK property sector. As a multiple of average earnings, it is now at its highest level since April 2008, with average house prices at 5.35 times the average salary in the UK. The only time it has been higher since records begin in 1983 was between April 2006 and March 2008, after which time house prices fell by 19% within a year. Thats not to say house prices will fall over the next year, but it does provide an indication that the seemingly never-ending price rises of recent years may be coming to an end.
Perhaps this, then, is the obvious conclusion to draw from bubbles. In the short run, they can be an investors best friend, and lead to vast gains in a relatively short space of time. However, once valuations are either historically high or are seen built on smoke and mirrors, rather than profitability or some tangible value of an asset, its time to sell up and walk away. The discipline to do this, though, is incredibly difficult to summon, but one thing is for sureselling into a bubble means that you will have sufficient cash to sit back, relax and wait for the next one to appear.
Of course, finding the best places in which to invest is never an easy task. That’s why The Motley Fool has written a free and without obligation guide called 7 Simple Steps For Seeking Serious Wealth.
It’s a step-by-step guide that could make a real difference to your portfolio returns in 2015 and beyond by helping you to find the best assets at the lowest prices.
Click here to get your copy – it’s completely free and comes without any obligation.