The governments decisions to offload its holdings in Lloyds Banking Group (LSE: LLOY) and Royal Bank of Scotland Groupwere good ones the outlook for shareholders in both firms looks precarious to me.
Is Lloyds one of the worst dividend choices on the market?
Dividend investing strikes me as a sensible strategy likely to deliver dependable returns over decades, but only if I select shares carefully.
How tempting Lloyds seems as its price-to-earnings (P/E) rating falls and its dividend yield rises even as the earnings outlook appears to be rosy. How can I go wrong if I move in to tap that fat payout?
Things may not be as they seem. I dont think its ever right to think of cyclical firms such as Lloyds as buy-and-forget investments. Right now, Lloyds Banking Group looks something like a seductive Venus flytrap for unwary investors who buzz around the sweet-smelling high yields in the stock market garden.
Tempting as Lloyds might be, the biggest share-price gains in the current macro-cycle seem behind us and the downside risk looks enormous. The Venus flytrap is beginning to twitch and I think the government saw it coming.
The big moves up could be behind us
At todays 73p, Lloyds shares are just about where they were at the end of 2013 and were more or less flat the whole time in between. Over the same two-year period, earnings grew from 415 million to around 8,117 million, and increase of 1856%. So why did the share price remain where it was during that earnings recovery?
That looks like the forward-looking nature of the stock market in action. The big rises in Lloyds shares happened during 2012 and 2013 when the market anticipated the firms recovery in profits. Now it seems the shares could be anticipating another down-leg.
The big London-listed banks profits, dividend payments, and share prices wiggle up and down, often by an alarming degree, in accordance with the boom and bust economics that we have to live with.
54p might be close
Investors as a whole figured out the cyclical nature of banks long ago and the stock market tends to mark down banks valuations as a macro-cycle matures. I think thats happening with Lloyds right now. So the P/E rating faces down pressure as earnings continue to rise because investors fear the next cyclical plunge. If the P/E rating falls, the dividend yield will go up.
I remember how attractive the banks looked just before last decades credit-crunch. When dividend yields rose to match the falling P/E rating many labelled the banks square shares, and they seemed super-attractive good value. Buying then was disastrous because the banks shares plunged the stock market tries to iron-out cyclicality but fails.
The credit crunch might have been an extreme event but economic cycles are common. Lloyds valuation looks as if it could be heading towards square territory again to me, and thats a major warning sign. Given the firms forecast earnings for 2016, the shares would need to be at 54p for the dividend yield to match the P/E rating. It doesnt take a big mental leap to imagine square happening, if not during 2016, at least at some point down the line.
The regulatory environment remains tough for banks in Britain, competition is fierce, and Lloyds earnings have already done their bouncing back. With valuation-compression dragging on investor total returns from here and the ever-present threat of a cyclical downturn, Lloyds Banking Group looks like a risky investment proposition to me.
The Motley Fool’s analysts look at similar considerations when searching for rock-solid shares for dividend and capital gains over the long term. Their free special wealth report called Five Shares To Retire On target’s a buy-and-hold strategy, and you won’t be surprised to learn that Lloyds Banking Group did not make the cut.
These five large-cap firms (and there isn’t a single bank amongst them) have healthy balance sheets, dominant market positions reliable cash flows, wide exposure to global markets and decent growth prospects. That makes them strong candidates for income and capital growth in your portfolio — without the threat of a cyclical trapdoor to fall through down the road!
To get your copy now, completely free and with no obligation, click here.
Kevin Godbold has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.
