Youve probably read the phrase buy when theres blood in the streets hundreds of times. Thats because its a strategy that works.
Over the years, there have been thousands of pages of research published on the subject, and all these studies reach the same conclusion the best time to buy is when others are selling.
Unfortunately, all these studies also show that in the short-term, underperformance is inevitable. Moreover, any seasoned investor will tell you thats its almost impossible to time the market.
Market timing mistakes
Trying to time the market by moving out of stocks when the outlook appears bleak, with the plan to buy back in when things improve, often ends in failure and can cost investors dearly.
You see, most of the markets gains are usually made in a very small period. Missing just one or two days of trading can wreck years of performance figures.
For example, between 1994 and 2013 the S&P 500 returned 9.2% per annum. However, if investors had missed the indexs best ten days of trading over this two-decade sample period, annual returns would have slipped to just 5.5%.
By missing the best 30 days of trading, returns would have collapsed to a mere 0.9% per annum. Miss the best 90 days of trading, and investors would have lost 8.6% per annum between 1994 and 2013.
Over the above sample period, the market experienced two major setbacks: the dot-com boom and the financial crisis. The figures suggest that investors who did nothing throughout both of these crises came out better than those who attempted to avoid them.
Even though the figures above are based on the performance of the S&P 500 an American index theyre still relevant. The S&P 500 is considered to be the worlds leading stock index, accounting for around 12% of the global equity market capitalization.
Buy when others are fearful
Another study, this time looking at investors performance over four decades showed similar results to the study above.
In this study, four hypothetical investors each invested $10,000 in S&P 500 from January 1, 1972, to December 31, 2013, but all four investors acted differently during the 1973 to 1974 bear market. Between 1973 and 1974 the S&P 500 lost 50% of its value.
The Nervous Investor sold out and went to cash. The Market Timer sold out but moved back into stockson January 1, 1983, at the beginning of a historic bull market. The Buy and Hold Investor held steady throughout the period.
And lastly, the OpportunisticInvestor realised that the bear market had created opportunities andcontributed an additional $10,000 to his original investment on January 1, 1975.
How did these four very different investment styles work out?
Well, by 2013, the Nervous Investors $10,000 investment had returned a compound gain of 9.6% in total over four decades! The Market Timer did slightly better, with a total return of 2,500% over the period. The Buy and Hold Investor did even better, with a total return of 6,440%.
However, the Opportunistic Investor saw theircapital increase in value by a total of 15,210% over the period, turning $10,000 into $1.5m. If thats not an incentive to buy when theres blood in the streets, I dont know what is.
On yourway to a million
If you’re looking for more money making tips, the Motley Fool has put togetherthis new report, whichguides you through the seven key steps all successful investors follow to build wealth.
The report is designedto help you become astock marketmillionaireand explains why you only need to spend20 minutes a monthon your portfolio.
Click hereto check out the report today—it’s completely free and comeswith nofurther obligation.
Rupert Hargreaves has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.