Despite recent market turbulence and the still elevated possibility of further upset during the months ahead, I will be steering clear of Centrica(LSE: CNA), National Grid (LSE:NG) and SSE (LSE: SSE), some of the FTSE 100s most renowned defensive stocks. Heres why.
Twin threats: regulation & high leverage
Lower energy prices aside, one of the biggest threats to the UK utility sector at present is the ongoing Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) inquiry into energy costs and pricing practices across the industry.
If the CMA eventually finds against the incumbents then this will probably result in enforcement action, which could take the form of either an industry breakup or, at the very least, tighter regulation of the prices charged to consumers.
This places a significant question mark over the future stability of earnings at Centrica, National Grid and SSE, which in turn has its own implications for trios growth prospects over the medium term.
However, regulation is not the only issue facing the sector as high leverage is also an impending problem that will eventually need to be dealt with, particularly in light of the impact that rising interest rates could have upon financing costs and, therefore, the bottom line in the current low-price environment.
This point is illustrated by a brief look at the balance sheets debt/equity are at 2.2x and 2.1x for Centrica and National Grid, respectively, while gearing also comes in at 66% for both companies.
The outlier in the selection is SSE, which boasts a debt/equity ratio of 1x and gearing of 47%.However, concerns over the groups dividend will probably continue to outweigh the benefits of a best in class balance sheet for at least the foreseeable future.
Dodgy dividend cover
On balance, Centrica and SSE are the most exposed to current regulatory scrutiny, although if the CMA were to more actively regulate prices then it would only be a matter of time before this downward pressure feeds through to the bottom line at transmission-focused companies like National Grid.
In addition, leverage remains too high at all threecompanies, while the dividend outlook has also deteriorated during recent quarters, which calls into question the standing commitment of all three businesses to maintain a progressive dividend policy.
If we look at dividend cover levels across the board, ignoring adjusted earnings figures in favour of the IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standard) eligible numbers found inthe financial statements, it soon becomes apparent that Centrica, SSE and National Grid are all sailing very close to the wind when it comes to covering their existing payouts.
In detail, the above analysis returns dividend cover ratios of 1.24x for National Grid and 0.67x for SSE, while for Centrica dividend cover remains frightfully low even after last years re-basement.
Taking into account 2014s losses, if you apply the consensus estimate for EPS in the current year to last years re-based payout, it suggeststhat future cover will probably be in the region of 1.3x.
Neither of these ratios are even remotely encouraging and, in addition to rendering the current low valuations across the sector completely irrelevant, they are among the key issues that make me believe thatthe dividend question will probably be among the largest detractors from returns for the all threecompanies during the next 12 18 months.
As a result, Ill be observing price action at each of these companies from a safe distance throughout the coming quarters.
If, like me, you are growing wary of the risks surrounding the traditional pillars of support for your portfolio during turbulent times, then you may find one of our latest guides of interest.
This free report will provide you with a step by step guide to building an income stream for life.
It is completely free and comes without any further obligation.
So, getyour free report nowand begin building Dividends For Life today.
James Skinner has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Centrica. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.