A version of this article originally appeared on Fool.com
WASHINGTON, DC Throughout the years, Ive countered manyApple(NASDAQ:AAPL.US) bears, poking holes in their bearish theses. That includes Ed Zabitsky of ACI Research (Part 1andPart 2),Paul Schatzof Heritage Capital, andDavid Trainerof New Constructs, among others. Of course, sometimes, the bears can be right, likeJeff Gundlachof Doubleline Capital even if Gundlach isnow in the Apple bull camp.
What bear should we poke at next? Adnaan Ahmad of Berenberg Bank, come on down!
Is Apple worth just $60 per share?
Apples latest earnings release has received a mostly warm reception from investors and Street analysts. Not Ahmad, though, as he has long maintained a sell rating on Apple shares alongside a $60 price target, a rating he reiterated the day after the report.
Ahmad acknowledges that the iPhone 6 is a compelling upgrade and a strong product, but perhapstoocompelling andtoostrong. So much so, that the effect may be to pull demand forward, and that future iPhone models will lack a meaningful selling feature. As a result, Ahmad expects 2015 to be a good year for Apple but then, he thinks the company risks substantial deceleration in 2016. For what its worth, hes also bearish on Samsung.
Stop me if youve heard this one before
If the whole Apple-is-doomed-but-wait-a-year thesis sounds familiar, its because Ahmad has said exactly the same thing before. Almost exactly two years ago in October 2012, Ahmad said, As we have stated before on many occasions, Apples time to turn from a tech titan into a dinosaur will come,but we still think that we are at least a year away.
At the time, Ahmads pessimism was predicated on the notion that Apples premium pricing strategy was unsustainable, and Apple would be forced to cut prices in the face of escalating competition, or simply lose market share. The resulting margin pressures would be painful for the company and its shareholders, according to Ahmad.
Ironically, Ahmad actually had a buy rating on Apple (and Samsung) at the time, but believed the writing was on the wall for the iPhone business.
Sell Apple but Apple should buy Tesla?
Five months later, Ahmad downgraded both Apple and Samsung to sell, saying competition in the smartphone market would kill ASPs and margins for both companies. He figured gross margin would fall to the 30% level, and could potentially even decline to the 20% level like other consumer electronics manufacturers.
Ahmad makes numerous comparisons to other handset vendors that have suffered this fate in the past, including Motorola, Nokia, and LG, to name a few. Ahmad thought shares were heading to $360 (approximately $51.43 split-adjusted).
Later that year, Ahmad would also write an open letter to Tim Cook and Apples board, suggesting that Apple should buyTesla,and enter the auto market with an iCar.
Back to the future
That brings us back to the present, and Ahmads forecast of Apples future. Ahmads predictions about gross margin have not played out. Its true that gross margin was under pressure in 2012 but mostly because they had reached unsustainably high levels. It was good while it lasted, but some contraction was always inevitable.
Margins have now stabilized around the 38% level, and Apple has some margin tailwinds going forward, including a higher-priced iPhone 6 Plus, and commodity prices remain favorable. In fact, the biggest margin headwind that Apple faces in the current quarter is foreign exchange rates as the U.S. dollar continues to strengthen against most other currencies. Apples hedges can only mitigate this risk to a certain extent.
More importantly, Apples pricing power remains intact. The company does not want to suddenly adjust prices in foreign markets based solely on fluctuating exchange rates (known as price harmonization). Foreign exchange headwinds are temporary, and dont play a part in Ahmads bearish thesis.
Put another way, Ahmads $60 price target implies a $352 billion market cap. Backing out Apples $130 billion in net cash would then translate into an enterprise value of $226 billion. That would be less than the enterprise value of rivals likeGoogle, even as Apples implied net income guidance for the current quarter ($14.4 billion) is more than Google makes in a year ($13 billion).
Wait for it
At the heart of it, Ahmads basic premise is that Apples profitability is unsustainable, and that it will succumb to historical trends of mean reversion. Thats similar to David Trainers thesis (linked above), except Trainer was looking at net operating profit after tax, or NOPAT, instead of gross margin.
Youd think that, by now, it should be obvious that Apple has unrivaled pricing power, which allows it to maintain margins better than any other consumer electronics company on Earth, subject to natural fluctuations. Apple is far from the average company, so mean reversion is less applicable to the Mac maker. More broadly speaking, comparing Apple to hardware-only OEMs is misplaced, because Apples unique pricing power comes precisely from its integrated hardware/software strategy in the first place.
So far, Ahmads calls or Zabitskys, or Trainers, or Schatzs havent come to fruition. Maybe next year.
We’re in it for the long term here at the Motley Fool, andwe focus on investing in businesses for years rather than months. It’s over that kind of time horizon that we can make sensible judgments on how a business is likely to perform, and whether the price is right.
If you’d like to see what I’m talking about, thisinvestment dossierfrom our top Fools may be of interest to you.
It’s called ‘The Fool’s Five Shares To Retire On‘, and it’s currently free to view. It contains the five shares which we believe could be perfect for building a long-term portfolio. If you’re looking for investment ideas, which you can act on right away, this would be an ideal place to start.
Click hereto get instant access without any obligations whatsoever!
Evan Niu, CFAowns shares of Apple and Tesla Motors. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple.